I am downloading a shot-on-video Jess Franco film from 2000 called Helter Skelter.
One of the director's least talked about productions.
A few less than enthusiastic user reviews on IMDb. A few blurry screengrabs.
That's all I've researched so far.
Why choose to watch something like Helter Skelter? A film that is bound to be self-indulgent and terribly made? To see how old people cope with life. Jess evidently doesn't want to retire. I don't know if he can afford to. Perhaps not. Still, I prefer to think that Franco keeps making these 'attempts at cinema' because he loves the process, and not just to exploit his fans.
Lots of Jess' recent productions are near worthless. Exercises in padding and digital video manipulation. They're mere excuses for Franco to keep busy. He has to produce something. Something that can be packaged with catchy cover art and supplemented with another of his fascinating interviews. With Paula-Paula it was the extra material (Jess clad in a bright red jumper) that I could sit through without getting a headache while the main feature left almost no impression on me.
So far I've downloaded half the DVD. Some of the .VOB files are already playable.
In such fragmented state Helter Skelter looks fascinating.
Over-saturated colours, uncalled-for slow-motion effects, superimposed imagery plus off-screen narration. Supposedly it's quotes from de Sade. This narration could really help putting the abstract imagery and episodes of simulated copulation into context, to make the film bearable. I wonder if I'll be able to sit through at least 30 minutes of Helter Skelter once it's fully downloaded.



.avi_snapshot_01.09.33_%5B2012.01.29_16.48.34%5D.jpg)
.avi_snapshot_00.47.57_%5B2012.01.29_16.19.13%5D.jpg)
.avi_snapshot_00.33.12_%5B2012.01.30_13.20.17%5D.jpg)
.avi_snapshot_01.27.50_%5B2012.01.30_13.21.03%5D.jpg)









